Mohammed Mansour, Is He A Pedocentrist Suffering From A Reaction Formation?
Latest posts by Michael Christianson (see all)
- Can Defendants Accused of An Underage Sex Crime Trust Their Defense Attorney? - May 5, 2019
- Boys, Girls, And Indiana’s Age Of Consent Laws – I.E., Two Children May Be Old Enough To Have Sex! - April 10, 2019
- It’s Primarily the Women in America who are the REAL Child Molesters & Threat to Harm Children - March 30, 2019
- The Story of The Amazing Letter P! - March 21, 2019
- “The Story of The AMAZING Letter P” By Dr. Michael Christianson, M. Esq., JUD - March 19, 2019
HAARETZ publishes Mohammed Mansour. Is he a pedocentrist suffering from a Reaction Formation?
La Porte (IFA) © Michael Christianson. One mental health professional, Mohammed Mansour, likes to say he treats child victims of sexual abuse.
In a 2017 Israeli news article from the HAARETZ he discussed how the young boys and girls in Gaza are ongoing victims of parental abuse. He tells the interviewer, “For children who endure sexual abuse, there is an element in the abuse that is pleasurable. Children who endure protracted sexual abuse, without anyone working with them on their trauma, deny and repress the pain involved, and focus on the pleasurable part. A child like that is prone to even greater harm, and prone to harm other children.’ His 50 cent words are a muddled mess of lies and hyperbole.
Mr. Mansour is correct that the boys and girls gain enormous pleasure from the naked play experience. But he is incorrect in stating that this “protracted” naked play is “sexual abuse” and that the child is “repress[ing] the pain…” His subjective opinion is a gutless regurgitation of the same fallacies being disseminated by the main stream media and mental health practitioners with a Ph.D. to stoke national outrage and discriminate against a sexual orientation that is natural and acceptable in numerous cultures – civilized and uncivilized. Time and again, an abundance of naked play in large regions of the world (were the social charlatans of the mental health profession have no access to the children) results in absolutely NO inward or outward harm to the children or the adults.
While it is a despicable fact that adult men and women rape and sodomize and engage in painful coitus with children, this does not pertain to consensual acts of oral pleasure or inter-femoral naked play that pedosexuals advocate for.
Mr. Mansour’s lies are laid bare once the reader continues deeper into his interview. Further in, the reader is told by Mr. Mansour of how he confronts the children and “…explain[s] to them that they [themselves] have undergone abuse, and that what they are doing to other children is abuse.” The falsehoods in this statement are abundant and unambiguous. Why does anyone have to teach a child to be a victim? No animal or human being needs help recognizing when they are a victim of suffering or trauma. No child ever receives pleasure from pain. It’s not only impracticable, it’s impossible. But here he is, attempting to “fix” what is not broken by applying psychological parlor tricks to effect his result.
For the vast number of Gaza boys and girls there is no abuse, no abuse whatsoever. The child does not perceive the erotic affections of the other child or adult as painful, but as simply pleasurable, and freely engages in the naked play without resistance or trepidation. So how do we explain the unnecessary grooming of these children by Mr. Mansour (an unwelcome outsider)? How do we explain why, in his popular opinion, these bright, fun-loving and sensually adventurous children must be converted into sexual victims, who will told that they are suffering from multiple tragic sexual affairs and are doomed to a life of mental trauma?[intense_blockquote font_color=”#b2141a” author=”Albet Ellis, Ph.D.”]By not caring too much about what people think, I’m able to think for myself and propagate ideas which are very often unpopular. And I succeed.[/intense_blockquote]
To properly explain Mr. Mansour’s pedocentric infatuation with turning the world’s carefree, resilient children into a pile of mental mush I first need to reveal his devious weapon of choice and then try to explain, in my learned opinion, his true motivation.
Ellisian Conversion Therapy
Mr. Mansour is practicing a culturally accepted form of neo-psychological conversion therapy, a humanitarian evil I have termed the Ellisian Conversion Therapy (ECT). ECT has its basis in the research and theories of Albert Ellis, an American psychologist who in 1955 developed Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT). He held MA and PhD degrees in clinical psychology from Columbia University and the American Board of Professional Psychology (ABPP). But let’s not get carried away with his credentials – they were purchased after all. What stands as the greatest social accomplishment of Dr. Ellis is his Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy. Without going into the boring details, Dr. Ellis determined, correctly, that children and adults become mentally, emotionally and behaviorally upset or unbalanced, not from the particularly gratifying naked play itself, but from the feelings and ideas they are instructed to attach to those erotic events either before, during, or after the events have happened, particularly from external forces like ECT. Two quotes will help to clarify REBT for the reader: “When you think positive, good things happen,” Matt Kemp informs us. His words are inline with REBT. As are Peace Pilgrim’s who opines, “[i]f you realized how powerful your thoughts are, you would never think a negative thought.”
ECT, it must be clearly stated, is the psychological weapon of choice stockpiled by the mental health profession, and it is being daily unleashed against vulnerable children and unsuspecting adults. It inflicts severe emotional and mental injuries in every person it targets. If ECT is successful the child or adult will transition from healthy and happy into sexual abuse survivor or victim.
Pocketing the ECT playbook, a mental health professional will use orthodox and unorthodox methods to modify the child’s point of view related to naked play and the child’s mental construction that it is fun, pleasurable, and beneficial (often termed “Unhelpful thinking” or “Negative Mental Distortions” by the the mental health industry). Over time, and with enough grooming, the trained mental health professional can break down the child’s resistance to ECT and introduces self-defeating/self-sabotaging behaviors and thoughts, such as “sex is bad” or “naked play is abuse,” in the child’s mind (often termed “Helpful thinking” or “Positive Mental Distortions” by the mental health industry).
A Reaction Formation
We know in Gaza (as in other parts of the world – Brazilian rain forest, Africa, Asia, Middle East) the vast majority of boys and girls are experiencing traditional naked play with other children and responsible adults in a relaxed state of euphoria and sensual liberation. In small bedrooms and hidden alcoves energetic boy’s wearing nothing but a smile are energetically waggling their beautiful, little erections, offering them up to willing young friends or older persons to be orally pleasured, without any reservation or fear. Girls, likewise, are offering themselves to their trusted playmates and older friends, unashamed and naked, for a brief moment of blissful release.
Then, along comes Mr. Mansour. He appears from out of nowhere – the gallant knight riding upon a white horse to rescue the children in distress. Or is he?
Interestingly enough, Mr. Mansour isn’t attempting to alleviate human suffering by helping the sick or dying old men and women. Iin fact, he doesn’t seem preoccupied with or particularly interested in any of the adults mingling about him during his excursions to the Gaza strip. Instead, he is busy orchestrating a one man crusade to Save-the-Children from the perils of what he wrongly thinks is sexual abuse.
Why Gaza? Why the children? I theorize he, as I suspect so many other mental health practitioners do, does what he does from a Reaction Formation. Otherwise, why groom and mentally molest another country’s children? A case for Reaction Formation is the best explanation at this point in time. A Reaction Formation is a mental defense these quote-unquote “saviors of the world’s children” use to conceal their true erotic desires for children. It’s believed that reaction formation develops as a mental means to cope with the pressure and stress caused by the original feeling of pedosexual attractions, the thing they have identified as being bad, and with the possibility of their true feelings or desires being discovered. For example, if a person has a particular erotic attraction to boys that she feels is shameful, she may take every opportunity to condemn those who share the attraction in order to demonstrate to others that they are “normal.” We witness this cruelty play out on Facebook and news sites everyday when someone gets arrested for naked play.
As you study the Anna Salters, the Dr. Phil’s, and their peer psychologists practicing within the child sex niche, you’ll hear them spewing a mouthful of psychological babble, while moving heaven and earth or going to great lengths traversing the continent to get as close to an openly practicing pedosexual culture as they can. These professionals, by feigning “helping” the sexually abused children to “heal” are visually able to project themselves as a normal, respectable educated men and women. But in reality, they struggle internally to keep under cover the possibility of their true erotic desires for these children being uncovered. However, for many of these pedocentrists being so close to the boys and girls, without actually participating in the naked play, is a pressure release as well. And of course, we can’t rule out that many of them actually participate in the naked play, too.