The Socially Acceptable Molestation of Boys By Those Most Trusted With Their Care and Well-Being
Dr. Michael Christianson
Latest posts by Dr. Michael Christianson (see all)
- Tor, TAILS & VPNs – Tested And Proven 5 Star Privacy Protection For Online Activity - May 19, 2019
- The Socially Acceptable Molestation of Boys By Those Most Trusted With Their Care and Well-Being - May 7, 2019
- Lisa & Jan, An Enlightenment Book for Children and Their Parents (A Sex Education Book for Kindergarten Children In Switzerland) - May 5, 2019
- The Definitive Guide to Naked Play: In the Bigoted, Fear-Mongering, Pseudo-Scientific Age, by Michael A. Christianson - April 3, 2019
- The (Pedophile, Paedophile, Pedosexual) In Me, You – Everyone - January 6, 2019
La Porte (IFA) © Michael Christianson
In the warped world view of Angelicism, misandristic women are consumed by hatred and fear when it comes to the erotic freedoms of boys and girls. Yet, these same women will commit horrendous and vile acts of molestation on their boys without considering the long-term mental health and physical consequences the child may ultimately have to endure for decades or more.
One such act is the surgical operation known as circumcision – or the mutilation of the genitalia of boys. For centuries now, Christianized women, primarily, have followed the blind will of a dead god who is believed to have instituted this practice as a covenant with the Jews – even though the early and modern Christians would be delighted to know ancient Egyptians and Eastern Africans were practicing rudimentary methods of circumcision on boys and girls long before the Hebrews invented their God and declared circumcision a holy pact between the Israelites and a monotheistic god. According to Paula Veiga, a scholar from the University of Lisbon, “[in] surgical terms, circumcision may be the oldest known surgery in Egypt.” Herodotus even recorded the fact that priests had to shave regularly and undergo circumcision. However, ancient reliefs show boys around eleven or twelve – not infants – being circumcised. Veiga asserts this is because the Egyptians saw circumcision as a rite of passage into manhood.
What’s so baffling about this whole practice is the fact that the children are subjected to this brutal molestation of their newborn penises without their consent, that it is an act of violence, and that society continues to embrace this outrageous conduct without raising a call to have the parents and doctors arrested, tried, and imprisoned for this flagrant abuse of a child’s right to be left alone. Yet, across this nation parents and doctors will spare no expense in proclaiming classical pedo-oriented naked play to be:
a crime of violence (when no actual violence occurs);
legally non-consenting (even when the boy or girl expressly consents); and
punishable against the adult with exorbitant fines and terms of imprisonment that are clearly cruel and unusual among rational thinking persons.
Meanwhile, the mental health community condemns pedosexuals and labels us mentally ill in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition. I have to wonder, if an adult can be imprisoned for 50 years in the state of Indiana after performing just a single act of oral sex upon the penis of a 12-year-old boy (who is expressly consenting to have his penis pleasured), why are the parents and doctors, who intentionally, without the child’s consent and in a violent manner, allowed to forcibly mutilate the natural intact penis of a boy or girl and remain immune to the social outrages and criminal prosecutions being leveled against the classical pedosexuals? It makes no sense. If, as the courts and victims advocates would have us believe, every child is permanently scarred by classical naked play – even if it is conducted in a safe, consensual, non-violent, and age-appropriate manner then why aren’t we branding circumcision (a true form of child molestation) “CRIMINAL” and having these despicable parents and doctors prosecuted with the same fierceness being leveled against classical pedosexuals.
There is no rational answer that can be given to mutilate a boy or girl’s genitalia when it is not medically necessary to preserve health or to save a life. If the child wants to have his or her genitalia mutilated can’t they simply request the operation when they reach maturity? No one among us can deny that circumcision causes extreme pain, discomfort, bleeding and the increased risk of infection at the site of the circumcision, irritation of the glans, increased risk of meatitis (inflammation of the opening of the penis) and risk of injury to the boy’s penis. All while a single act of oral sex or masturbation of a boy or girl – when done in a safe, consensual, non-violent and age-appropriate manner – only brings significant pleasure and happiness to the child.
We certainly live in the age of ignorance.’
To learn more about a boy’s view on pedosexual relationship and love, please visit Boys Speak Out. A NAMBLA sponsored page.
James deMeo. The Geography of Genital Mutilations. The Truth Seeker, pp 9-13, July/August 1989., DeMeo, James. The Geography of Genital Mutilations. (Presented at the Fourth Symposium on Sexual Mutilations, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. August 9-11, 1996.) Published in: Sexual Mutilations, A Human Tragedy, Plenum Press, New York, 1997 (ISBN 0-306-45589-7), Indiana Code 35-42-4-3, Indiana Code 35-50-2-4