What Separates Our Modern Mental Health Professionals From The Rabbi Jesus And Pedosexuals
Latest posts by Michael Christianson (see all)
- Can Defendants Accused of An Underage Sex Crime Trust Their Defense Attorney? - May 5, 2019
- Boys, Girls, And Indiana’s Age Of Consent Laws – I.E., Two Children May Be Old Enough To Have Sex! - April 10, 2019
- It’s Primarily the Women in America who are the REAL Child Molesters & Threat to Harm Children - March 30, 2019
- The Story of The Amazing Letter P! - March 21, 2019
- “The Story of The AMAZING Letter P” By Dr. Michael Christianson, M. Esq., JUD - March 19, 2019
A Christian virtue unpracticed – Righteousness
La Porte (IFA) © Michael Christianson. The most important quality, I believe, of a civilized person is what the Jewish Rabbi Jesus once taught his followers thousands of years ago, it’s referred to as righteousness. Righteousness is a masterful combination of love for others, compassion, benevolence, and justice. It is humanity or civility in the bigger sense. When a person is righteous she will love others, treat them kindly, and act fairly – cruelty is as foreign to the righteous person as speed is to a sloth. The christian concept of righteousness is part Jen and Yi – the words used in Confucian philosophy. When a person has fully realized righteousness she will have realized the full potential of the heart-and-mind.
As I pointed out in the first paragraph, righteousness is at the heart of fairness, or justice. Confucius once put it this way: “the superior [person] does not set [the] mind either for anything, or against anything: What is right he will follow.” In effect, Confucius is saying that there is no black or white, no absolute sin, no completely wicked person. Righteousness also possesses some of the similarities of Aristotle’s Golden Mean. Aristotle taught, correctly, that moral behavior is the mean between two extremes – at one end is excess, at the other deficiency. When we find a moderate position between those two extremes, we will be acting morally – righteous.
How righteousness evades the mental health profession
For those in the mental health profession it is extremely difficult to live righteously. These “lettered” men and women must, by the very nature of their professions, live ungodly lives, lives where insidious forms of human cruelty are carried out on decent human beings and the perpetuation of human suffering is accepted as an inevitable side effect in their pursuit of a cushy livelihood for themselves and a silver-spoon lifestyle for their families. In effect, mental health professionals, such as physiologists, psychiatrists, therapists, counselors, and others like them are willingly forsaking righteousness for ego-centered prosperity.
The psychological sciences are merely an invention born from a selfish necessity. It’s modern birth is attributable to one Wilhelm Wundt who is considered by many to be the father of psychology. He opened the Institute for Experimental Psychology at the University of Leipzig in Germany in 1879. His signaler motive was to control the psychology marketplace, still in its infancy, by instituting a new subjective curriculum that would be sold to the wealthy gentlemen and youth of his day and which would also be mandated classes before his buyers (aka social charlatans) would be able to pander its misery throughout Germany – and the world. Today, Wilhelm Wundt’s miserable legacy has created a multitude of social charlatans following in his foot steps, his band of rag-tag descendants putting on their sideshow performances in schools, offices, and prisons, deceiving judges and selling a cornucopia of crap.
To rid ourselves of this social fungus that is modern mental health we must first forbid these madmen and -women to groom our children and teaching us to accept the “just world theory,” as it relates to the psychological sciences. Instead, we must become better acquainted with the nature’s truth, nature’s laws. Nature’s truth shows us that mental health practitioners (while doing some good) are a coven of social charlatans practicing intolerable crimes against humanity; it shows us that the world of psychological sciences is not a righteous endeavor, so it can never be just; it counsels us, telling us that what is happening to the socially ugly, the marginalized and ostracized is unreasonable, unacceptable to civilized men and women; and it teaches us while there is a modicum of fairness in psychology, when it begins with pedo and ends with sex, justice is an illusion. A smoke screen concealing crimes against humanity – destroying, as G.K. Chesterton once said, “…all our knowledge of human nature.”
Several thousand years—and seven thousand miles—separate the Rabbi Jesus and mental health practitioners from pedosexuals.
How deceitful Christianity is distorting the historical bible to suite the modern culture 0f pedosexual hatred
Fact: No even .01% of professed Christians can read or even comprehend the historical Latin or Greek written and spoken near the shores of Palestine some 2000 years ago. Yet 99% of these so-called “believers” daily struggle to twist and bend the Latin and Greek words and phrases – found inside its doctored pages – in order to compel the apostle’s letters to agree with unjust notions of pedophilia and pedosexuals.
Add to the mix the never ending ability of American bigots, misandrous women, and other deceitful persons to open a heretical church at any place, for any reason, at any time, and we have the recipe for social disorder. For example, click over to gotoquestions.org, were you can read about how the unorthodox Guardians-of-the-Question are using grammatical magic to transform mundane historical teachings into permission to ostracize and punish pedosexuals.
While no words ever uttered by their dead christian god made mention of pedophilia as a sin or vice, they teach their visitors through misguided interpretation.
These immoral opportunists at gotquestions.org write, “The word translated “fornication” has the same idea in both the Hebrew and the Greek. The Greek word is porneia, from which we get the English words porno and pornography.”
But this statement is patiently false. Porneia from the time of Rabbi Jesus simply meant prostitution. It is written 25 times in the old and new testament pages of their sacred book – depending on which publishers decide to print it truthfully, and which translators decide to translate it truthfully.
Much later translations of the apostle’s letters by the Roman and English speaking world decided (I’m sure after much prayer and their god’s blessing) to change porneia into fornicati, fornicatus, fornicata, and fornicatae. (I’m also certain this slight bit of literary editing was their dead god’s intention from the beginning, you know, to create mass confusion in 2018 over Rabbi Jesus’ use of an ancient lexicon. Because, well, why not, Rabbi Jesus must have foresaw it. Him being SO omniscient, and all. He must have known that we would one day discover over 6,500 spoken languages around the world. And he must of known how keen all 6,500 of these languages like to slightly or moderately or significantly alter the meaning of the words porneia and fornicati.)
So, what we know today, is fornication is generally consensual sexual intercourse between two people not married to each other. But the term still carries an overtone of moral or religious disapproval, with the significance of the sexual acts to which the term is applied varying between religions, societies and cultures!
To the point, then. “The King James Version is specific and says ‘adultery,’ while the Contemporary English Version reads ‘“some terrible sexual sin!’ All other translations lie somewhere in between. Whether it is ‘unchastity’ in the New American Standard Bible or ‘sexual immorality’ in the New Living Translation, English Standard Version, and the New King James Version, no matter which translation is used the meaning of the passage is still vague and ill-defined[,]” writes Philip R. Leineweber, in his remarkable, beautifully researched Senior Thesis titled, The Greek Word Porneia in the Matthean Exception Clauses. (Read his Thesis below.) His thesis can be summed up in a few simpler words, though: Today, Porneia means what your religious leaders decide it to mean. Although, Mr. Leineweber comes the closet to the truest historical meaning.
This website writes as if the 2000 year old authors of Romans and Timothy knew enough about human nature to expound intelligently upon the subject. It’s a farce, though. For eons great farting and defecating men and women, considered valuable for their knowledge or leadership role within a certain society, have attempted to bend other humans to their moral will. These attempts normally manifest themselves in written form and carry the threat of eternal damnation or punishment by an otherworldly being, called a god. For example, Moses has his god etch the laws of nature onto a stone tablet. A stone tablet that this all-mighty god couldn’t even manage to preserve long enough for use modern folks to take a peek at. How convenient. And the christian bible fares no better. It’s pages have been altered due to thousands of years of hand transcription and liberal religious interpretation. You could discover this truth by visiting jw.org and carefully reading the online article, while reminding yourself that near perfection is still imperfection (although they would have you believe otherwise.) It’s remarkable how these masters of religious spin tell believers that the christian bible remains “basically” unchanged. Kudos for getting it right some of the time, ye ol’ master transcribers.
Or visit gotoquestions.org and they can help calm your fears by falsely proclaiming: “Of the less than 1 percent of the text that is in question, no doctrinal teaching or command is jeopardized. In other words, the copies of the Bible we have today are pure. The Bible has not been corrupted, altered, edited, revised, or tampered with.” All this spin is free without guiding you to scholarly articles that beg to differ, such as this site or this site.
Codex Sinaiticus Video
Readers may want to view this video talking about the discovery of the Codex Sinaiticus. A word of caution: the announcer is using this video, at the end, attempts to compel religious adherents to follow allah. It’s the last minute or two and has no bearing on the codex Sinaiticus being discussed.
This video bears witness to several alterations to the christian bible. Copyright Seven Fold Films
Carl Jung spoke of the badness of an addiction to the psychological sciences
Interestingly, Carl Jun must have seen this current social addiction of average people blindly accepting every theory of the psychological sciences as justifiable and true. He once quipped that: “Every form of addiction is bad, no matter whether the narcotic be alcohol, morphine or idealism.” Yet, I doubt he would have been able to foresee how present day psychology has been able to warp the average pedosexual’s loving nature into something salacious and perverse – in effect, creating a social majority of intolerant, bigoted pedocentristic citizens turned hammers, who are busy treating even the decent erotic or sensual encounters with children as a nail.
In conclusion, the bible makes a great religious book for the fast-talking, bible thumping elocutionists and orators busy proclaiming god’s glory for notoriety, tax free dollars, cost free living, and a very generous pension while giving the fearful and cowardly a place to grieve, but it is not, I repeat IS NOT, a historical document. Truth denounces its lies and the lies of its interpreters.
No matter how the social charlatans bend the historical truth of pedophilia, truth prevails. In every culture around the world, some form of pedosexual relationship has been permitted – whether or not the majority of citizens had a different of opinion on the matter, the pedosexual practice was at least tolerated with reasonable limitations.
Finally, we can never win against obsession unless we fight. If they care, and we don’t – they win. So, what then? We must be as obsessed with winning the right to live in this world as free pedosexual men, women, and children as the obsessive majority who seek to destroy us and our cause.